About Me

Name: The Bell Tower
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

Primary Colors

Pardon me if I’m not shocked by the latent racism displayed in Hillary Clinton’s campaign this season. Anyone who’s been listening to the Democrats talk about race for the past 20 years should be unsurprised. It is too much to hope that a party enamored with nonsensical bean counting will implode as a result of this perfect storm of identity politics. Perhaps though, this could be the beginning of the end of identity politics itself. We can only hope.

Ferraro

“I’m sorry, I said nothing negative,” she told FOX News earlier Wednesday. “I care about the black vote in this country. I really don’t think this is right that they should attack me as racist.”

Of course she doesn’t think she said anything negative. This is how the Democratic party leadership has logically considered race within the mind of the electorate for years. Black people vote for black people, women vote for women, hispanics for hispanics… etc. Who can forget Bill Clinton pardoning members of the FALN during Hillary’s campaign for Senate in 1999 in an effort to court the Puerto Rican vote in New York?  It should come as no surprise to find Ferraro assessing the political landscape based soley on race. That is the ideology of the party.

Here’s more:

Those backwards Mississippians

“I was shocked when I learned Iowa and Mississippi have never elected a woman governor, senator or member of Congress,” Clinton told the paper. “There has got to be something at work here. How can Iowa be ranked with Mississippi? That’s not the quality. That’s not the communitarianism, that’s not the openness I see in Iowa.’”

Translation: Mississippi is mostly backwards - and black. In light of Ferraro’s comments, is it surprising that Hillary made this statement?

How about this comment from her husband:

Oops.

Even with this presumably innocent comment, what else can she mean:

…as he should have…

“I’m well aware that Senator Obama has an enormous amount of support here, as he should, as he should have,” Clinton said. “Some people have said ‘Well Mississippi is very much a state that will most likely be in favor of Senator Obama.’ I said ‘Well, that’s fine,’ but I want people in Mississippi to know I’m for you.”

Why should he? Why “should he have” support in Mississippi? The answer of course is that he’s black and the large population of black people in Mississippi are going to vote for a black candidate. IE: they are incapable of thinking independently. This is what Hillary Clinton and those within her campaign think. It’s been painfully obvious and percolating just below the surface for this entire election season. In fact, it’s been around far longer but the beauty of Obama vs. Clinton is that the campaign has brought this logic into the spotlight. This is the intellectual hole that Democrats who think like Hillary Clinton have been digging themselves into for years.

You see, the peddalers of identity politics have no respect for the communities which they divide. How could they? If your opinion of a community of people is that they reduce complex political decisions to skin color, you have no respect for that community. It’s that simple.

In reality, the backward thinking is not in the electorate. It’s in the upper reaches of the Democratic party - and it has been there for a long time. Whatever conservatives and the right think of Barack Obama’s liberalism - he is changing the mentality of race and gender in politics and hopefully in the Democratic party. Perhaps this is bad news for those who want another Republican President; but if it spells the death knell of identity politics - it is good news for this country.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Blacks and Whites

Nonsense

“The disparities between black and white Americans remain consistent, nagging and substantial,” League president Marc Morial told Reuters.

“The next (U.S.) president has to take the bull by the horns and change the nation’s priorities and focus on domestic initiatives,” he said in an interview.

No, the next President does not have to take any bull by the horns nor does the office of the Presidency have the power to resolve such an issue. Wealth is not an entitlement. When are people in this country going to figure that out? Government cannot “fix” equality problems - it can only attempt to guarantee equal opportunity. I say attempt because racism can only be battled where it can be identified. Some people seem to find racism almost everywhere but that is part of the problem. As for wealth disparity, it should not be battled by government at all.

Here’s the 10-point plan

“Our nation has had enough of poll-driven focus-group tested drive-by-politics as usual,” Morial said. “We need concrete detailed proposals to get our urban communities back on track to economic prosperity. If we don’t close the equality gaps existing between minorities and mainstream America now, we threaten to lose our advantage on the world stage and undermine our standard of living for generations to come.”

This is nonsense. It is not siginficant to the country’s prosperity which groups of people attain wealth. If that were true, this country would have disappeared from the map long before now. It is only significant to those groups unable to achieve it - and more precisely, those individuals. Identity politics is part of the problem. There’s nothing wrong with the National Urban League working to increase the equality in wealth between blacks and white. It becomes wrong when they try to institutionalize it with government entitlement. Most of this 10 point plan is precisely that.

More importantly, trying to define the broad spectrum of the black community into a single group is injurious to blacks as a whole. The National Urban League and groups like them preach diversity as a powerful tool in business and society and then proceed to destroy that diversity. There is diversity within the black community that is stifled by this kind of thinking. Black children learn from early on that they have no fair chance in this country because of the color of their skin. Most of that hopelessness today does not come from whites but from blacks and it is rooted in this type of group thinking and group labeling.

There’s no space to get into every point of this plan but some of this stuff by itself is just plain garbage. Indexing the minimum wage to inflation for instance. This is equivalent to taking a fishook, inserting it into your ear lobe, tying the hook to a rim on your car and proceeding to drive down the block. Increasing the minimum wage does not increase wealth for people who make it - it decreases the number of jobs available at that rate. Rich people and businesses do not provide jobs as a benefit to the community, they do it to accomplish a business objective. When that objective becomes more expensive, they survive by cutting costs. In other words, those making minimum wage are more likely to lose the job they currently have. This is not racism, it’s a simple economic fact.

The funny part is when we get to step 9:

“Changes in the government contract landscape - more subcontracting, bundling and coding errors — have resulted in pushing more and more small firms out of the market. In 1996, minority firms received only $0.57 for every dollar they would have been expected to receive based on their availability.”

Small firms are driven out of the market precisely because of government intervention and regulation - the minimum wage for instance. Big businesses like MacDonalds or WalMart can sometimes absorb the increased costs of employing minimum wage workers at a higher rate or being forced to cover employee health care. What do you think happens to smaller businesses? If you said “They go out of business”, take a cookie.

And then step 10:

“Minority-owned business development has been hamstrung by lack of access to capital, business networks and intergenerational wealth that helps their white counterparts get off the ground.”

This is an excellent point about intergenerational wealth. The study at the core of this call to action finds that the black community has less wealth collectively than the white community. That translates into much less opportunity for someone born into a black family from ever having the opportunity to amass enough wealth to go into business for him or herself. So then, how is drastically increasing the costs of starting and running a small business helpful to the black community at all?

The answer: It isn’t.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »